THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
The pluses in corporate philanthropy
By 0, 1/13/2003 Corporate giving has fallen substantially in recent years precisely
because there is so little alignment between current giving practices and
corporate objectives. Public companies have a responsibility to
shareholders, and ''doing the right thing'' is no longer a sufficient
rationale for corporate giving or a sufficient guide to how corporations
can truly benefit society. Demonstrating the business value of investing
in the community will increase corporate giving, not diminish it.
There are many different needs in our society and many different types
of donors and institutions seeking to address them, including individuals,
foundations, and government. The question is, where can corporations use
their giving most effectively to tackle social problems and achieve broad
social impact?
Not surprisingly, the answer is in areas related to their businesses
where they have expertise, contacts, and skilled employees who allow them
to add value beyond the money.
Bailey is concerned that our approach would do little for ''some guy
who spends his nights in a doorway or a mom who can't feed her kids.''
Unfortunately, corporations cannot solve every social problem. However,
many of the examples cited in our article involve companies directly
addressing those people in greatest need. Cisco's network training
academy, for example, works with the UN to serve populations in 24 of the
world's poorest countries.
One of the most distinctive contributions of corporate philanthropy is
to boost employment opportunities and create the conditions for healthy
local and national economies. Here corporate philanthropy offers a more
sustainable answer to the plight of the homeless man or hungry child, not
just more charity.
MICHAEL E. PORTER
MARK R. KRAMER
Boston
Porter is a professor at Harvard Business School. Kramer is
coauthor, with Porter, of ''The Competitive Advantage of Corporate
Philanthopy.''
This story ran on page A10 of the Boston Globe on
1/13/2003. |